Case studies

Savings (5) Fuel / Emission

      Automobiles

      Trucks

      Buses

      Locomotives

      Motorcycles

      Aircrafts

      Vessels

      Manufacturing Units

      Power Plants

      Building Heating Systems

Air Conditioning Savings (5)

Accolades & Installations (5)

Aircraft Analyses (5A)

Habitat for Humanity (5H)

AC/Refg Product (5R)

US DEPT HUD analyses (5U)


Habitat for Humanity (Cluj, Romania)

 


Time period Distance
(km)
Fuel used (liters) Consumption
/100km
Km / liter City (O) / outside (A)
13.02.2005 222 14,61 6,58 15,20 A
13.02.2005 20.02.2005 218 17,77 8,15 12,27 O
20.02.2005 228 14,34 6,29 15,90 A
20.02.2005 25.02.2005 146 13,27 9,09 11,00 O
27.02.2005 671 41 6,11 16,37 A
27.02.2005 14.03.2005 406 36,59 9,01 11,10 O
 
Average in city 770 67,63 8,78 11,39 O
Average outside 1121 69,95 6,24 16,03 A


Time period Distance
(km)
Fuel used (liters) Consumption
/100km
Km / liter City (O) / outside (A) Savings compared with average
14.03.2005 20.03.2005 248,7 21,02 8,45 11,83 O 3,77%
20.03.2005 223 12,75 5,72 17,49 A 8,37%
20.03.2005 03.04.2005 513,6 40,6 7,90 12,65 O+A 10,00%
03.04.2005 17.04.2005 544 45,7 8,40 11,90 O 4,35%
17.04.2005 223 11,09 4,97 20,11 A 20,30%
17.04.2005 02.05.2005 509,6 42,13 8,27 12,10 O 5,87%
02.05.2005 223,4 11,06 4,95 20,20 A 20,66%


Emission reduction of using less fuel only of 20.7% savings for 1 month:
  (pounds)
CO2 -266.1
Carbon Mox -7.4
NOX -0.2
PPM -5.5
H C -0.2



Q (from CZ) - Please explain how is possible the consumption dated 20/3/2005 is 8,37 than 17,4... how can I understand this how is it possible or was used another car ?

A - "It was exactly the same car. How was it possible? I spoke with a skeptic engineer who said that traffic, weather, driving style, and load are factors that influence the consumption, so all of this are influencing the results of my test. But I'm telling you that everything happened exactly as Dr George Molteni said it will happen if I use the stabilizer. After two weeks since I started using the stabilizer the fuel consumption had already dropped (8,37 savings). But after 30 days, which was Dr G's recommended test period, the savings got over 20%, it is exactly what the Doctor predicted that will happen. Even more, I thought that part of the savings were because the weather became warmer since February, when I made the initial test (without stabilizer) until March and April when I finished (with the stabilizer). But I spoke with the engineer I mentioned above (he is the chief professor at the Mechanical Faculty in the Technical University of Cluj, Romania) and he said that running on long distances, where the engine gets warm and stays so, an engine gets a better fuel consumption when it is cold outside, and a higher consumption when it is warm. That is because the air is more "heavy" when it is cold, and there is more oxygene getting into the engine, so the quantity of air needed for burning the fuel is bigger. So, the weather was not the reason for the savings."