|
|
Habitat for Humanity (Cluj, Romania)
| Time period |
Distance
(km) |
Fuel used (liters) |
Consumption
/100km |
Km / liter |
City (O) / outside (A) |
| 13.02.2005 |
222 |
14,61 |
6,58 |
15,20 |
A |
| 13.02.2005 |
20.02.2005 |
218 |
17,77 |
8,15 |
12,27 |
O |
| 20.02.2005 |
228 |
14,34 |
6,29 |
15,90 |
A |
| 20.02.2005 |
25.02.2005 |
146 |
13,27 |
9,09 |
11,00 |
O |
| 27.02.2005 |
671 |
41 |
6,11 |
16,37 |
A |
| 27.02.2005 |
14.03.2005 |
406 |
36,59 |
9,01 |
11,10 |
O |
| |
| Average in city |
770 |
67,63 |
8,78 |
11,39 |
O |
| Average outside |
1121 |
69,95 |
6,24 |
16,03 |
A |
| Time period |
Distance
(km) |
Fuel used (liters) |
Consumption
/100km |
Km / liter |
City (O) / outside (A) |
Savings compared with average |
| 14.03.2005 |
20.03.2005 |
248,7 |
21,02 |
8,45 |
11,83 |
O |
3,77% |
| 20.03.2005 |
223 |
12,75 |
5,72 |
17,49 |
A |
8,37% |
| 20.03.2005 |
03.04.2005 |
513,6 |
40,6 |
7,90 |
12,65 |
O+A |
10,00% |
| 03.04.2005 |
17.04.2005 |
544 |
45,7 |
8,40 |
11,90 |
O |
4,35% |
| 17.04.2005 |
223 |
11,09 |
4,97 |
20,11 |
A |
20,30% |
| 17.04.2005 |
02.05.2005 |
509,6 |
42,13 |
8,27 |
12,10 |
O |
5,87% |
| 02.05.2005 |
223,4 |
11,06 |
4,95 |
20,20 |
A |
20,66% |
Emission reduction of using less fuel only of 20.7% savings for 1 month:
| |
(pounds) |
| CO2 |
-266.1 |
| Carbon Mox |
-7.4 |
| NOX |
-0.2 |
| PPM |
-5.5 |
| H C |
-0.2 |
Q (from CZ) - Please explain how is possible the consumption dated 20/3/2005 is 8,37 than 17,4... how can I understand this how is it possible or was used another car ?
A - "It was exactly the same car. How was it possible? I spoke with a skeptic engineer who said that traffic,
weather, driving style, and load are factors that influence the consumption, so all of this are influencing the
results of my test. But I'm telling you that everything happened exactly as Dr George Molteni said it will happen
if I use the stabilizer. After two weeks since I started using the stabilizer the fuel consumption had already
dropped (8,37 savings). But after 30 days, which was Dr G's recommended test period, the savings got over 20%,
it is exactly what the Doctor predicted that will happen. Even more, I thought that part of the savings were because
the weather became warmer since February, when I made the initial test (without stabilizer) until March and April
when I finished (with the stabilizer). But I spoke with the engineer I mentioned above (he is the chief professor
at the Mechanical Faculty in the Technical University of Cluj, Romania) and he said that running on long distances, where
the engine gets warm and stays so, an engine gets a better fuel consumption when it is cold outside, and a higher
consumption when it is warm. That is because the air is more "heavy" when it is cold, and there is more
oxygene getting into the engine, so the quantity of air needed for burning the fuel is bigger. So, the weather was not
the reason for the savings."
|
